Athens and Sparta :: essays research papers fc

During the period of Greek history from the last years of the Persian Wars till the beginning of the First Peloponnesian War, the primacy of Sparta declined whileAthens was gaining increased influence in Greece. The Athenian, Thucydides (460-400 BC), one among few contemporary historians, left behind the most creditable records about this period. Although he did not give enough documentation for many events he described, his Histories remained the main resource of the facts from that time. In consideration of the fact that he was an Athenian and a participant of the Athenian army, future historians could not entirely count upon his writing. In the 480-479 BC there was great anxiety about the strength and magnitude of the Persian threat. Although the Greeks had managed to force Persians retreat from the Greek mainland, the danger of reconquest by the Persians was still present. In the battle of Plataea (479 BC), the Greeks, under the Spartan regent and general Pausanians, obliterated the Persian army. The Greeks also won a naval victory at Mycale. Although the war drugged on for many years, these two victories marked the end of the Persian threat to Europe and the beginning of the period of Greek greatness. The idea of panhellenism - the awareness of Greek unity- appeared as a reaction to the fear of the Persian invasion. This is how Persia helped the Greece to recognise their identity, which gave significance to the year 479 BC to be marked as the beginning of the Classical Greek period. At the other side, the year 479 BC does not represent a vital turning-point in politics. Sparta’s control over her allies was still unbroken. After the Greeks’ triumph on Plataea, when the fear of the Persian invasion decreased, the idea of the united Greeks started diminishing. Phthonos (envy) was what characterised the relationship between Sparta and Athens, and between many other city-states after the Persian Wars. Their rivalry was constant. The most important direct result of the wars was the establishment of Athens as dominant Greek naval power. This gave Athens the opportunity to create, in the years to come, an extensive empire over the newly won territories which had no parallel in earlier Greek history. A new political order emerged among the Greek states centred on the two great powers of Athens and Sparta that was to have a profound effect on later Greek history.

The Ben and Jerry’s Ice Cream in Russia

Russia has a known reputation in the ice-cream industry. They are known for their flavorful ice creams that are of a wide flavor varieties. The Ben and Jerry’s Homemade, Inc. founded in Burlington, Vermont decided to have a franchise in Russia, which longs for modernization of its market economy. Since ice-cream is considered as a commodity, they thought of using it as an entry point to strengthen their economic growth. The franchise was named ‘Iceverks’ – Ice Cream of Vermont and Karelia.This was also thought of to bring together diplomacy in America and Russia although there were risks on doing such kind of business, even if Vermont and Karelia are sister cities. There was also an effort of change of political systems from strict social, the communist system, to the democratic political system. The management of Iceverks taught the necessary tools to the employees and managers to equip them for proper and good management strategies.Then suddenly the clima te inside the management changed, with the lessening of the effectiveness in their management because their local partners have become better in equipment to manage the joint venture. With this, they just decided to donate their equipment to the management and the equity to their local partners (Moss, 2000, p. 136). In 1997, Ben and Jerry’s has left Russia, with the Iceverks no longer using Ben and Jerry’s as their brand name.For me, although this happened, we cannot say that the venture was unsuccessful, because the Iceverks was able to maintain their standards for ice cream production and customer satisfaction services, the legacy that the Ben and Jerry’s left for Russian and even other foreign customers. The Ben and Jerry’s intention was not really on the profit but on the development, because instead of withdrawing all the equipment in the Iceverks because they are leaving, they even donated it to them.The corruption in the Mafia also brought about th eir withdrawal of management because of the matter of philosophy. The Ben and Jerry’s did not want to give consent to the bribery or corruption there was just to have protection from the Mafia. The American companies were required to pay 30% more of their profit just to acquire the said protection. Again, the economic shift was hard to attain that time.The mind set of the Russian managers was more on the capitalist ideology, which hinders them from being immediately penetrated by the training they received from the American managers, which the Ben and Jerry’s have given much effort on. Since Ben Cohen, the founder of the Ben and Jerry’s, is more of the ideal businessman, he was more of a diplomatic and socially responsible person. He did not care much of the money involved in the business. But then, there was an observed loss of jobs because the company has enormous money loss that could not support the work force any longer.As mentioned above, the Russian partn ers, who are in profit maximization, decided to split up with the Ben and Jerry’s, which made B&J just leave and leave their equipment to them. Leaving the Iceverks was somehow a much better decision than staying, because eventually the political system will eat them with their principles. In fact, they have succeeded in other countries like Japan, France and the UK, applying the same business strategies. It was a good decision to leave also because of the very unstable economy, with lots of financial risks, etc.that have affected much of their transactions, from simple packing to large machineries and refrigerators, etc. The big cultural differences also contributed to their decision, because they do not have the total control and regulation of the political and philosophical missions and visions of the company, since it is a joint venture. Reference Moss, L. S. (2000). Bankruptcy Reform in Russia: The Case for Creditor Rights in Russia. Review of Russian Economics, 13, 121- 146.

History and structure of PepsiCo - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1743 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Marketing Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? Pepsico is founded by Donald M Kendall. He was the chief executive officer of PepsiCo and Herman w lay chairman and chief executive officer of Frito-lay through the merger of the two companies. Pepsicola was created in the 1890 by Caleb Bradhan. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "History and structure of PepsiCo" essay for you Create order Firto-lay was formed by the merger of Frito company in 1961. Herman is chairman of the board of the director of this Donald M Kendall is president and CEO. The new company report sales of 510 million dollar and has 19000 employees. Major product of the company. Pepsi-colaDiet Pepsi and mountain dew. Mountain dew launch its first campaign yahoo mountain dew. Doritos brand tortilla chips are introduced . Pepsi introduced the industry`s first two liter bottle. Pepsi is the first company to respond to consumer preference with light weight, recyclable plastic bottles. Pepsico acquires pizza hut was founded in 1958 by Dan and frank Carney. In 1980 PepsiCo food service international is formed to focus on overseas development of restaurant. Pepsico had 111000 employees in 1980. Pepsico launches PepsiCo food system, its restaurant supply company. In 1981 five me a dew success the slogan reach for the sun, reach for the mountain dew. In 1985 PepsiCo is now the largest company in the average industry. The company has revenue of more than 7.5 billion dollar more than 137000 employees. Pepsico available in nearly 150 countries and in 10 international markets. In 1990 PepsiCo sign the largest commercial trade agreement in history with the soviet union. Pepsico profit exceed 1 billion dollar for the first time. Key facts Global headquarter situated in New York. Annual revenue nearly 60 billion dollar , 52% beverages, 48% snacks and foods 61% in the U. S and Canada , 39% international. Chairman and CEO of this company Indra K Nooyi Now Pepsico has 285000 employee. Corporate structure Pepsico is comprised of four business units 1.Pepsico Americas beverages 2.Pepsico America foods. 3.Pepsico Europe . 4.Pepsico Asia, Middle east , Africa. Strategies for growth Pepsico has several key strategies for long term, sustainable growth . Building the company`s global macro snack portfolio. Responsibly and profitably growing the company`s beverage business. 3. Building the company`s nutrition business, in dairy , grains, fruit and vegetables. 4. Delivering on commitment. 5. Refreshing the organization to prosper in a changing environment. Some brands of PepsiCo Pepsico offer the world`s largest portfolio of billion- dollor food and beverages brands, including 19 different products line. Some brands name following; Pepsi Aquafina Lipton Mirinda Mountain dew Fritolay Tropicana Quaker Energy juice AMP Sabritus Walkers Gamesa Sierra mist 7up Pepsico in India Pepsico enter in Indian market in 1988 by joint venture with the Punjab government owned Punjab agro industrial corporation and Voltas India limited. They sold Lehar Pepsi until 1991, when the use of foreign brand was allowed PepsiCo bought out its partners and ended the joint venture in 1994. The headquarter of Pepsi in India is in Gurgaon and chairman of Pepsi Mr. Rajiv Bakshi. Presently it is operated in196 countries. Pepsico is the second largest food beverage company in the world. it manufactures market sales a variety of salty, sweet grain based snakes, carbonated non-carbonated PepsiCo seeds to achieve growth long turn value in it operational activities by creating competitive advantage through new product innovation. At PepsiCo were committed to achieving business and financial success while living a positive imprint n society- we delivering what we call a performance with purpose. Grow international revenue art two times real global GDP growth rate. Ensure high level of associate engagement and satisfaction as compare with other 500 companies. Launching its agro-business in India with special focus on exports of value-added processed foods, Pepsi Foods Ltd. (PepsiCo hereafter) entered India in 1989 by installing a Rs 22 crore tomatos processing planrt at jahura in Hoshiarpur district of Punjab. The company want to produce asptically packed pastes and pures for the international and national market. Before it goes ahead, the company recognized that the investment in agro-processing plants would not be viable unless the yields and quality of agricultural produce to be process were up to international standards. At that point of time, tomato had never been cultivated in Punjab for its solid content, with a focus on high yields and other desirable processing characteristics such as colour, viscosity and water binding properties. Furthermore, little effort had been made to create a database on the performance of various varieties an d hybrids, or to introduce modern farming practices. There were no logistically efficient procurement models for fruits and vegetables that could be built on by the company. These apart, there were simply not enough quantities of tomato available even if the grown varieties/hybrids were procured from the open market. The total Punjab tomato crop was 28000 tons, available over a 25-28 day period, while PepsiCo required at least 40000 tons of tomato to operate its factory, which had a gigantic capacity of 39 tons fresh fruit per hour. The company required this intake over a minimum 55-day time frame, and in 1989, the season in Punjab did not last beyond 28 days. Sceptics had expressed doubts over the feasibility of the Zahura tomato processing plant, and had said that it would remain a museum piece! There were formidable challenges before the company and nothing short of a horticultural revolution was required to solve the problem. There was no choice but to alter the tomato productio n and logistics situation in Punjab. This led to the birth of PepsiCos backward linkage with farmers of Punjab. PepsiCo follows the contract farming method described earlier, where the grower plants the companys crops on his land, and the company provides selected inputs like seeds/saplings, agricultural practices, and regular inspection of the crop and advisory services on crop management. The PepsiCo model of contract farming, measured in terms of new options for farmers, productivity increases, and the introduction of modern technology, has been an unparalleled success. The company focused on developing region- and desired produce-specific research, and extensive extension services. It was thus successful in bringing about a drastic change in the Punjab farmers production system towards its objective of ensuring supply of right produce at the right time in required quantities to its processing plant. Another important factor in PepsiCos success is the strategic partnership of the company with local bodies like the Punjab Agricultural University (PAU) and Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. (PAIC). Right from the beginning, PepsiCo knew that changing the mindset and winning the confidence of farmers would not be an easy task for outsiders. The companys unique partnership with PAU and PAIC fuelled its growth in Punjab. Pepsi believes that its snacks food has given a great fillip to potato cultivation in India. Each year it buys thousand of tons of potatoes from Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and from places as far away as Karnataka. Local potato varieties are good are good for table purpose but unfortunately not good for chip making because of their high moisture and sugar content , which causes browning in chips. So Pepsi imported six processing varieties, some of the best varieties of mini-tubes, from its own Pepsi facility in the united states. They gave them to the central potato research institute(CPRI) in Shimla for testing. There is a restriction o n the import of potato seeds because it is a vegetatively propagated crop; a disease will be passed on to the offspring. The CRPI certified and released five varieties for trials and cultivation. They are high on solids, their sugar levels are low and they are good on colour and uniform in size. Pepsi began multiplying the seed through tissue culture at their research farm in 1995. The phenomenon increase in yield has led to doubling of farmers income to about 30,000 per hector. Success in tomato processing is being repeated in chilies. More than 1700 farmer in about 5 Punjab district have planted Pepsi chillies .This is remarkable not due to the number of farmer who have planted chillies, but the fact that until Pepsi came in the picture ,there was almost no commercial chilli farming in Punjab as it was not economically viable. The average chilli yield was 5 tons per hectare. with the Pepsi technology and varieties the yield has short up four times about 20 tons per hectare. PepsiCos success is a result of the companys strategy to experiment with tomato and chilli varieties from around the world and develop from these their own varieties that work best of processing under local agro-conditions. In chillies, for example the company imported more than a hundred varieties from the united states, Korea , Holland, Indonesia, Taiwan and from India. They planted these on their research farm. Through tissue culture and other techniques, their scientist eventually evolved five or six varieties that have traits price the most for paste making-yields weight, size, solids, colour, pungency, resistance to disease- trials that are best under the states agro climatic conditions Pepsi produced several millions diseases free chilli plantlets at its farm and supplies them to the farmers with a buy-back guarantee at a predetermined price. Pepsico soon hope to get into ginger paste, garlic paste and the processing of several fruits like mangoes and guava to spread their agribusiness operation to other part of India. Pepsico operation in India are many and varied in addition to its many beverage business l,, the company has a modern rice plant in Sonipat Haryana, a joint venture project in the Tamil Nadu for manufacture of polyester chips and pre-forms used in making PET bottles and a canning factory in Maharashtra. In 2006 some problem had faced Pepsi due to phosphoric acid in this cold drink. This cold drink damage the stomach. They also desolve the calcium in the bones, making them frangile, and one another chemical added to cold drinks is ethelene glycol. And anti-freeze compound so that soft drink can consumed really chilled but it is known to cause of cancer. To coner the beta test of all the above additives, cold drinks contains an excessive amount of sugar 8 to 9 Tea spoon full per 300 ml bottle. It also create heart problem and of course acid and sugar also promote tooth decay. After that public mind had become Pepsi h ave made us mental slaves. They are destroying our health and destroying our environment of country .Their deprising drinking water and destroying their livelihood their brazenly breaking the law of the country yet the government is not taking action against them. Therefore Indian public think we must act and they join the growing country wide movement against pepsi.They took put a rally against pepsi on 16 february 2006 and many colleges and organization declare our environment is a pepsi free zone .

Analysis Of Katherine Mansfield s The Garden Party Essay

Kelsey Archuleta Ms. Sparks AP Lit p.6 8 December 2016 Title Katherine Mansfield was a modernist short story writer during the 1920’s. She wrote various short stories in the few years as an author, Mansfield s stories often commented on class, relationships, families, and sexuality, After reading a few of her most popular works the common theme of them though out was the central conclusion of them all is the protagonist coming of age by seeing the more realistic view on life. The common theme aids Mansfield’s in communicating to her readers the idea of one finally seeing the truths in his or hers personal lifestyles. Mansfield carries this central theme in all stories by using literary devices such as imagery and symbols. Mansfield’s stories contain her protagonist living in a situation where they are blinded by others or societies standards on how they should think or feel. For example Laura in The Garden Party , is confronted with the reality of death. Mansfield introduces the story by explaining t he extravagant garden party Laura’s mother is allowing her to plan. The details of Laura ordering around staff and the whole complexity of it all leads readers to believe that Laura and her family are of higher class. Because of this Laura has not been introduces to the realities of life such as Death. She has also been taught that because of her class other below her are â€Å"unacceptable† as her neighbors the Sheridans were unacceptable and â€Å"they were the greatest possibleShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Katherine Mansfield s The Garden Party 2275 Words   |  10 PagesBoth L.P Hartley and Katherine Mansfield present the poor as suffering as a result of the happiness of the rich. Within both texts, ‘The Go-Between’ and ‘The Garden Party’, the poor are shown to suffer but they are presented in two different ways. L.P Hartley presents one of the main characters, who is a rich, middle class woman manipulating a poor boy who visits from boar ding school through making him a messenger between her and her working class lover. Whereas, Mansfield presents the rich to ignoreRead MoreTylistic Analysis of Katherine Mansfield’s Garden Party1002 Words   |  5 PagesStylistic Analysis of Katherine Mansfield’s Garden Party To better comprehend our course: Style in Fiction, I have selected a short story the Garden Party, so as to analyze in terms of styles. 1. About the writer and the story 1.1 About the writer Beforehand, I’d like to give a brief introduction of the short story’s writer Katherine Mansfield and the short story. Katherine was born in Wellington, New Zealand, into a middle-class colonial family in 1888. She studied at Queens CollegeRead MoreIn Vincent O’Sullivan’S Finding The Pattern, Solving The1578 Words   |  7 PagesIn Vincent O’Sullivan’s Finding the Pattern, Solving the Problem: Katherine Mansfield The New Zealand European, it is noted that Katherine Mansfield ‘was an enthusiast for the cinema’, that ‘she acted in several movies’ and that ‘her letters frequently took up such images as the months that â€Å"stream by like a movie picture†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢(18). Furthermore, her short story At the Bay begins with the line ‘Very early morning’(Mansfield 5), that when interpreted from a literary standpoint, is more suited to a screenplay

The Debate On Nuclear Warfare - 2049 Words

Nuclear Arms By: Debansh Sahoo In recent weeks/reports, North Koreas leader has threatened to wage war against the Americans. He made the statement â€Å"We will tear Americans to pieces, I don’t care what it takes even we will use nuclear weapon’s†. This brings alarm to the United States Nuclear policy and how they tolerate nuclear weapons from other countries. Should the United States tell all the countries who currently or are researching nuclear weapons dispose all their research. The debate continues as Prime Minister of Israel came in to talk to the congress about Obamas nuclear policy again. Should we keep our nuclear weapons or dispose all of them by making all the other countries who have these weapon’s to dispose theirs too. The†¦show more content†¦It is basically (nuclear weapon’s) that gave the United States the World Power that it is today. Many people still ask the question why do we still need these nukes or killers as they are often referred to as? They think that we (Americans) already have enough nuclear resources and what is the point of continuing to produce/develop them if there is no use to them and it practically wastes money for the countries that use/produce them. That money could be used to develop many other things in the country. But the American population is spilt minded, there is one side of the American people who think nuclear weapons are killers but then there is another side that who look at them as life saviors. I think everyone agrees that you could not put a value of human life. But nuclear weapons don’t value life. There has always been a purpose for nuclear resources, which is destruction. Everybody hears the statistics about the United States having enough nuclear weapons to blow the world up three times. This may be true, however as technology reaches new heights so do weapons and yo u can bet other countries are not settling for the weapons they already posses. They are always searching for more powerful weapons at any costs. If we were to stop the production of nuclear weapons we would be alone in that effort. When we have people like Kim Jong UN in the world, which we always will, we need the protection that only nuclear weapons can

Ways Social Media Is Changing the World Free Essays

Social media has had the ability to advance the world. In short amount of time, we have revolutionized so much such as receiving the news and communication. Due to social media, the way that we learn about and respond to anything affecting our world has changed. We will write a custom essay sample on Ways Social Media Is Changing the World or any similar topic only for you Order Now We have the ability to do so much like learn about new diseases in a few clicks. Social media is not just a place to observer a friend’s profile and see what they are up to. It is also a large source where people can come together. Huffington Post mentions that, â€Å"Interestingly, social media as a medium for connecting, organizing and communicating is powering and spreading democracy far better than billions of dollars of aid or war in corners of world very resistant to such change.† Social media creates a large platform where a community can quickly, make an impact on the world and for a cause. Technology is constantly advancing every day. In this time of social media, we have both social media activism (or digital activism) and hashtag activism. It is much easier today than it was to before to spread awareness on an important social issue. Using both hashtags and social media helps to easily spread and raise awareness. Another post from Huffington Post states that, â€Å"Hashtags have the power to bring attention to and mobilize a large population. Petitions, protests, letters to politicians and those in power are disseminated through social media.† InMyArea has mentioned a few of the many hashtags that have brought awareness over the course of a few years. â€Å"Social media’s role in activism can be credited to areas like these Abilene-Sweetwater, TX – #OccupyWallStreet Los Angeles, CA – #OscarsSoWhite Boston, MA – #ALSIceBucketChallenge Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN – #BlackLivesMatter #Charlottesville, VA† Social media activism includes raising awareness by using a variety of websites such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. By doing this, the world gets the opportunity to learn more about causes and movement as well as their needs. Most social media platforms have certain algorithms that will promote the most popular hashtags, doing this helps to bring critical social matters to the spotlight. Phycology Today mentions that there are, â€Å"four important ways that social media is redefining activism and advocacy.† First is that social media can change public awareness. Second, is that â€Å"social media distribution means we are getting information from someone in our network.† Third being that social media networks cross different platforms and creates a quick impact that gives it urgency. Lastly, social media development has changed the impression of communicating by modifying our expectations about participation. Social media has the amazing ability to provide the platform to anyone with access to the digital world and gives them the opportunity to call for change. The platforms that social media provide give people and communities the opportunity to create events to anybody almost anyone. The internet has always been a platform that has given anyone to form new communities and share resources. There are an increased number of groups who are now turning to practical tools, which allow them to create unified platforms to increase social change. There are several different tools used by online activists being online petitions, social networks, blogs, micro-blogging, cell phones and proxy servers. One of the other major characteristics of social activism is that it is almost always a non-violent form of protest. American Press Institute showed that 69% of millennials get their daily news while 85% say that â€Å"keeping up with the news is at least somewhat important to them.† It is true that this generation access their news differently, they do access their news regularly to keep up with any new information and things that are changing around them. Referring back to the study, a large portion of millennials did post recently about a topic they cared about on social media. Although it can be hard to keep up with at times, it is crucial to be aware of everything that is going on in the world. With social media frequently being updated every second of every day, people are easily able to obtain constant knowledge. Social media platforms have become more than just a way to share how you are feeling. Due to social media, people are no longer limited to just receiving their important news from one only one source. Social media has been able to advance the spread of awareness as well as the pace at which we can help as a community. Social media is a powerful enough tool for raising awareness. It gives everyone voice while it can also connect us all to a large variety of backgrounds, and cultures. How to cite Ways Social Media Is Changing the World, Papers

The main differences betwen the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences free essay sample

The Allies: Britain, the US and Russia, otherwise not on the most friendly of terms, were united only in their quest against Germany and the Nazis, as well as securing victory in the war. In 1945, two conferences were held with the top political leaders of Russia, the united States, and Britain. The Big Three, as they were known, met in February 1945 at Yalta, Crimea, USSR, and then again in July at Potsdam, Germany.These conferences, the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam conference respectively, were meant to decide the true of the world after the wardecisions made by the three most powerful men In the world at the time, from the three most powerful nations. While both conferences were meant to attempt a smooth transition into post-war life, the two summits still differed greatly, even though they were intended to accomplish the same things.The main differences between the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam conference were the changes In the Big Three between the conferences, alteratio ns In the aims of the leaders, and a general heightening of tensions between the three nations. We will write a custom essay sample on The main differences betwen the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The difference in the leaders involved in the two conferences was a major factor In the differentiation between Yalta and Potsdam. At Yalta, the Big Three was composed of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, U. S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin.At Potsdam, Attlee replaced Churchill after his defeat in the British elections, and Truman took Roosevelt position. The only constant figure In the conferences was Stalin, the leader of one of the most controversial nations in the world. As previously mentioned, the only issue the three entries truly saw eye-to-eye on was eradicating the Nazi presence from the world. Two capitalist nations allied with a vehemently communist one already poses some problems with communications, and the change from Roosevelt to Truman between the conferences only added to the discrepancies between Yalta and Potsdam.Truman stated of his ally Stalin that he was tired of babying the Soviets. Roosevelt, a much more diplomatic figure, was one of the key factors in the disparity between Yalta and Potsdam. While he also had doubts about Russia, Roosevelt kept hose feelings between himself and Churchill, without truly laying them out in the open. Truman openly stated that he was going to get tough with the Russians, and so contributed to the difference in policies that the US had regarding the Russians at Potsdam.The change In the Big Three at Yalta and Potsdam was a large part In the disparities In the two conferences. Other contributing issues in the difference between Yalta and Potsdam concerned the objectives of the Big Three at Yalta and the disagreements over them at Potsdam. At Yalta, Germany and Japan were both undefeated at the time, yet plans were being made as to Germanys division after its predicted loss. The Big Three intended to divide up Germany into French, British, Russian, and American sections.Russia also I OFF the war, totaling at about 20 million deaths and the destruction of over 1000 towns. Stalin wanted harsh payment from the Germans, involving the confiscation of about 80% of its industry, allied control of the economy, and annual reparations payments made to the allies. These numbers are vital to later understanding the mentality of he Russians by the time of the so-called Long Telegram. To look into the matter, a reparations commission was set up.Furthermore, in exchange for Soviet control of Poland (reorganizing the government to be made democratic), the Russians agreed to facilitate the formation of democratic states in Eastern Europe that would be freed from German control. Lastly, it was agreed upon that once Germany was defeated, Russia would formally enter the war against Japan to aid in its defeat. At Potsdam, however, these aims and objectives were forced into close scrutiny by the Big Three, ND major disagreements between the three leaders occurred.By this time, Germany had been defeated, although the US was still at war with Japan. Regarding Germany, which was agreed upon at Yalta to be split into four zones, the Big Three faced open contention over the boundaries of the four sections. Germany was also forced to pay reparations to Russia, and was forced to give up 10% of its industry. However, Britain and the US felt that it was too much and that milking Germany of all its assets would leave its people poor and starving. Other disagreements that arose involved theEastern European democratic states that were supposed to be established by Russia; Britain and the US claimed that communism was manifesting itself in those states with the aid of the S oviets, rather than the intended democracies. Lastly, Truman and Attlee had doubts in the Soviet control of Poland, after Stalin arrested all non- communists in the Polish state. Stalin wanted Attlee and Truman to recognize his authority over these puppet states, which they refused to do. The main difference between Yalta and Potsdam was the level of consensus reached in each of the inferences.The objectives were mapped out at Yalta, and then disputed over at Potsdam. Although they apparently remained the same on paper, there was much disagreement over the application of the aims, which then translated into the major difference between the two conferences. Another main difference between the Yalta Conference and the Potsdam Conference was the level of tensions between the Big Three. At Yalta, while there were still tensions present, most of it was hidden behind the scenes; at Potsdam, open disagreement was the case. When Churchill was part of the Big Three, he wrote to Roosevelt during Yalta The Soviet Union has become a danger to the free world. However, at Potsdam, there were open accusations regarding Russians approach to communism and their attempt at transforming the rest of Europe into a communist society. The changes in their objectives also inflamed tensions, with the disagreements over Germanys new borders, Soviet entitlement to reparations, and Russian power over Eastern Europe heightening the power struggles between the Big Three.Truman was also obviously angered by Stalins move to arrest all of Pollards non-communist leaders. Additionally, at Yalta, Russia had agreed to aid the US in their war against Japan; however, by Potsdam, Truman had had news of the atomic bomb testing and avoided notifying Stalin. Stalin was furious when he discovered Stalin in the dark. Tensions also increased when the US and Britain demanded free elections be held in Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria, whereas S talin insisted that they would remain under his control. In general, one of the main differences between theYalta Conference and Potsdam was the increase in strained relations between the Big Three. Yalta and Potsdam were the two major peace conferences in World War II. They were both intended to achieve a state of post-war peace, and yet somehow metamorphosed into the arising of further global discord. Even though issues at both conferences were the same, the conferences were not. The major differences between Yalta and Potsdam were the changes in the leaders involved, a shift in the objectives and aims of the conferences, and a great heightening of tensions between he Big Three.These two conferences were what set the standards for life after World War II, and were the preludes to the events of the Cold War.